a3holerman
Registered User
Cape Cod
Hi,
I am having a problem with the left front cowl mount when changing my 46 J3 from a A65 to a C90. I have posted on the J3 forum with considerable help but still am not clear on what to do.
Basically the front left cowl mount bracket mounts on standoffs that act also as the nuts for the front bearing case through bolts. The problem is that the C90 case flat area where the nuts sit is at a different location from the crankshaft c/l than is the 65. Actually the 90 is narrower so the mounting bracket will be closer to c/l than on the 65. What all this means is that the pin on the bracket will not match up with the holes on the cowling. It looks like I need to fabricate a wider nut/standoff or use a cylinder base nut type bracket. Wagaero shows, for the front mounting brackets, two cly base nut types, one for each side. The problem is they how no idea when asked if it will work on a C90.
There are a lot of C90/0200 powered cubs around so the issue has been addressed. Does anyone have any idea way is the accepted way to accomplish this?
Thanks for any help in advance.
I am having a problem with the left front cowl mount when changing my 46 J3 from a A65 to a C90. I have posted on the J3 forum with considerable help but still am not clear on what to do.
Basically the front left cowl mount bracket mounts on standoffs that act also as the nuts for the front bearing case through bolts. The problem is that the C90 case flat area where the nuts sit is at a different location from the crankshaft c/l than is the 65. Actually the 90 is narrower so the mounting bracket will be closer to c/l than on the 65. What all this means is that the pin on the bracket will not match up with the holes on the cowling. It looks like I need to fabricate a wider nut/standoff or use a cylinder base nut type bracket. Wagaero shows, for the front mounting brackets, two cly base nut types, one for each side. The problem is they how no idea when asked if it will work on a C90.
There are a lot of C90/0200 powered cubs around so the issue has been addressed. Does anyone have any idea way is the accepted way to accomplish this?
Thanks for any help in advance.