Agree about making decisions on the magazine's written word. There is a caveat in any opinion or survey for me: I use them to measure my own biases and then do my own thinking.
As for being all wet in articles concerning things we are familiar with, this also could be accurate. It depends on what is being measured. A good example is a Consumer Report on British Sea Gull outboards.
They were "not recommended" because of exposed flywheel, no reverse, risk of burning hands on exposed exhausts. All obvious risks, particularly for those unfamiliar with engines.
At the time the report was made about 25 years ago, the Sea Gull was most reliable engine for my hunting and fishing needs. They're stashed around lakes in plastic garbage bags during winter, always fire up within three pulls.
For my money, for simplicity and reliability, leaving them where I flung them for use in successive years, Sea Gulls are recommended for those who can keep their hands away from bad things and don't need reverse for two horsepower.