• If You Are Having Trouble Logging In with Your Old Username and Password, Please use this Forgot Your Password link to get re-established.
  • Hey! Be sure to login or register!

O200 and C90 power / torque curves

I’ve looked at that and the torque cure sure does fall off after 2550-2600, so I guess what Nicole says rings true. I just see Jim C saying that getting it up to 2700 area makes it quite a ride and makes me curious.
 
Last edited:
I note in passing that the diameter limits for a 76AK-2 prop on a Continental are max 74, min 72 (many folks think it is a 76 inch diameter propeller).

Using a 1B90-71-42, on an O-200 powered J-3, I get about 2550 static, and about 2640 during climb. By comparison, a 1B90-74-41 statics at 2500 (about the same static as Roger's ?74?-40) and climbs out at about 2600, but the 74-41 isn't legal on the O-200 yet.

Based on my experience, I'd say if you have a C90 lying around use it. If you have an O-200, use it. If you have both, use the one that's most convenient.
Except on a taylorcraft, some were 7441 and 7443 with the o-200
 
Do you REALLY think you are going to see a dramatic performance increase with an additional 60 RPM (now 75 RPM) over the manufacturers recommended limit? :roll:

John Scott
I did when my prop was pitched from 46 to 43, it got my rpm into a sweet spot for the power curve. But everyone expects something different
 
Back
Top