• If You Are Having Trouble Logging In with Your Old Username and Password, Please use this Forgot Your Password link to get re-established.
  • Hey! Be sure to login or register!

Understanding your flaps

Fortysix12

Registered User
RanchAero Grand Vista, Brooksville
I thought this was a good read on the use of flaps.

FLAPS
Flaps are high lift devices which, in effect, increase the camber of the wing and, in some cases, as with the Fowler Flap, also increase the effective wing area. Their use gives better take-off performance and permits steeper approach angles and lower approach and landing speeds.

When deflected, flaps increase the upper camber of the wing, increasing the negative pressure on the top of the wing. At the same time, they allow a build up of pressure below the wing. During take-off, flap settings of 10 degrees to 20 degrees are used to give better take-off performance and a better angle of climb, especially valuable when climbing out over obstacles.

However, not all airplane manufacturers recommend the use of flaps during take-off. They can be used only on those airplanes, which have sufficient take-off power to overcome the extra drag that extended flaps produce. The recommendations of the manufacturer should, therefore, always be followed.

Flaps do indeed increase drag. The greater the flap deflection. the greater the drag. At a point of about half of their full travel, the increased drag surpasses the increased lift and the flaps become air brakes. Most flaps can be extended to 40 degrees from the chord of the wing. At settings between 20 degrees and 40 degrees, the essential function of the flaps is to improve the landing capabilities, by steepening the glide without increasing the glide speed. In an approach over obstacles, the use of flaps permits the pilot to touch down much nearer the threshold of the runway. Flaps also permit a slower landing speed and act as air brakes when the airplane is rolling to a stop after landing, thus reducing the need for excessive braking action. As a result, there is less wear on the undercarriage, wheels and tires. Lower landing speeds also reduce the possibility of ground looping during the landing roll.

Plain and split flaps increase the lift of a wing, but at the same time, they greatly increase the drag. For all practical purposes, they are of value only in approach and landing. They should not normally be employed for take-off because the extra drag reduces acceleration.

Slotted flaps, on the other hand, including such types as Fowler and Zap, produce lift in excess of drag and their partial use is therefore recommended for take-off.

From the standpoint of aerodynamic efficiency, the Fowler Flap is generally considered to offer the most advantages and the fewest disadvantages, especially on larger airplanes, while double slotted flaps have won wide approval for smaller types.

On STOL airplanes, a combination of double slotted flaps and leading edge slats are common.

Changes in flap setting affect the trim of an airplane. As flaps are lowered, the center of pressure moves rearward creating a nose down, pitching moment. However, in some airplanes, the change in airflow over the tailplane as flaps are lowered, is such that the total moment created is nose up and it becomes necessary to trim the airplane "nose down".

The airplane is apt to lose considerable height when the flaps are raised. At low altitudes, therefore, the flaps should be raised cautiously.

Most airplanes are placarded to show a maximum speed above which the flaps must not be lowered. The flaps are not designed to withstand the loads imposed by high speeds. Structural failure may result from severe strain if the flaps are selected "down" at higher than the specified speed.

When the flaps have been lowered for a landing, they should not ordinarily be raised until the airplane is on the ground. If a landing has been missed, the flaps should not be raised until the power has been applied and the airplane has regained normal climbing speed. It is then advisable to raise the flaps in stages.

How much flap should be used in landing? Generally speaking, an airplane should be landed as slowly as is consistent with safety. This usually calls for the use of full flaps. The use of flaps affects the wing airfoil in two ways. Both lift and drag are increased. The Increased lift results in a lower stalling speed and permits a lower touchdown speed. The increased drag permits a steeper approach angle without increasing airspeed. The extra drag of full flaps results in a shorter landing roll.

An airplane that lands at 50 knots with full flaps selected may have a landing speed as fast as 70 knots with flaps up. If a swerve occurs during the landing roll, the centrifugal force unleashed at 70 knots is twice what it would be at 50 knots, since centrifugal force increases as the square of the speed. It follows then, that a slower landing speed reduces the potential for loss of control during the landing roll. It also means less strain on the tires, brakes and landing gear and reduces fatigue on the airframe structure.

There are, of course, factors, which at times call for variance from the procedure of using full flaps on landing. These factors would include the airplane's all-up-weight, the position of the C.G., the approach path to landing, the desired rate of descent and any unfavourable wind conditions, such as a strong cross wind component, gusty winds and extreme turbulence. With experience, a

pilot learns to assess these various factors as a guide to flap selection.

In some airplanes, in a crosswind condition, the use of full flap may be inadvisable. Flaps present a greater surface for the wind to act upon when the airplane is rolling on the ground. The wing on the side from which the wind is blowing will tend to rise. In addition, cross wind acting on full flaps increases the weather vaning tendencies, although in an airplane with very effective rudder control even at slow speeds, the problem is not so severe. However, in many airplanes, the selection of full flaps deflects the airflow from passing over the empennage, making the elevator and rudder surfaces ineffective. Positive control of the airplane on the ground is greatly hampered. Since maintaining control of the airplane throughout the landing roll is of utmost importance, it may be advisable to use less flaps in cross wind conditions. In any case, it is very important to maintain the crosswind correction throughout the landing roll.
 
Many folks simply set flaps to 20, raise the tail and sail down the paved, 4000 ft runway, lift off about ten knots above minimum unstick speed, accelerate to Vy+10, and climb to a thousand feet, before retracting flaps.

It has been said that when you are hot, high, and heavy, more flaps are better.

As an instructor, I find I cannot, even with math and vector diagrams, convince folks that the lift from flaps does not make airplanes go up faster. Read that carefully, and make sure that you do not come away with the impression that flaps help you climb.
 
So, would you agree that flaps are unnecessary on a PA-12 in the midwest where strips are 1600-8000 feet and lake landing lanes are miles long?
 
STWMAR14 Flew my -12 for 28yrs w/ out flaps, put them on in 2003 and don't think I've done a flaps up landing since. Besides the lower landing and takeoff speeds, the lower deck angle w/ flaps on landing is a real plus. Without them, a short landing required a slight nose up mushing decent on the back side of the L/D curve w/ the aircraft about to run out of elevator. Put flaps on your -12, you won't go back either.
Chris[/quote]
 
If you have unlimited space for takeoffs and landings, flaps are not necessary. They are more fun on landing, and if you have them it is good to use them. I always use full flaps on landing when I have them, and that includes the 737.

We are doing some tests on a 160 Cub, and find the distance to liftoff is quite similar for flaps 20 and flaps 0, but the speed at liftoff flaps up is maybe 4 mph faster. Less drag, faster acceleration.

I am not the world's most experienced seaplane pilot, but I'd guess a few notches for takeoff would be a good thing. My very amateurish attempts at flaps up water run followed by yanking flaps at what looks like liftoff speed loses about 10 mph instantaneously. Could be I jerk on the stick, but those boards do add drag.
 
Try getting a Cessna 185 or 206 on floats airborne without flaps, if you don't believe that flaps assist in takeoff performance.

Let me know what you found after you peel yourself out of the weeds on the far end of the HUGE lake.

MTV
 
I find it handy to practice landings with and without flaps. And flying a Super Cub from the back seat means no flaps.
I occasionally practice from the back seat as well as the front.. I had a passenger once who claimed to be an accomplished Cub pilot. Believing his self - evaluation of skill, I gave him the front seat. - His takeoff was a 'little' unusual.. but then a Cub doesn't spend much time on the runway..
On very short final, he announced "It's yours!".. and I suddenly wished that I had done more landings from the back.. All ended well, but an occasional practice session flying from the back would have made the landing a bit more professional.
 
mvivion said:
Try getting a Cessna 185 or 206 on floats airborne without flaps, if you don't believe that flaps assist in takeoff performance.

Let me know what you found after you peel yourself out of the weeds on the far end of the HUGE lake.

MTV

Or a Beaver or Otter.... and then dump them all and try to climb....
I guess no matter what is written, there will always be an exception or two to the rules...
JH
 
I have heard that the DeHavillands won't climb without flaps extended. I know for sure that the Cessnas will in fact climb clean. There comes a point where a Cessna will not climb with flaps extended, yet will struggle up with them retracted.

Flaps on takeoff are to reduce the takeoff roll or run. High grass, or water - you need some flaps - unless the lake is unlimited in length. Once the water drag of those amphib floats matches the power you have available, it is all over.
 
Beaver and flaps

I remember about 25 years ago, two of us in a Beaver on wheels tried to see how far/long it would take to take off without any flaps. We used up almost 9000 of Elemendorf AFB's runway before getting airborne. I wouldn't have believed it, had I not been there!
 
Back
Top