jimboflying
MEMBER
Does anyone know of a source for new PA12 tanks?
I lifted this off the J3 site, what it means for all the tanks they manufactured will have to be answered by him.I guess the STC'd tanks that were owned by the guys in Vermont are no more?
Randy at Carbon Concepts will make you a carbon set that conforms to the bay. He makes them for -18s as well.Are there any experimental PA12 tanks available?
I am tooling up now to make 24 gallon Experimental tanks now. I have 1 done and it fits good. Making the right one soon.Are there any experimental PA12 tanks available?
So stop using stock old tanks. Plenty of options.Problem with original tanks is they oil can and you only get so many cycles before they leak. I got 1500 hours and starting to get a leaker.
Actually there aren't. The PA12 used a different tank and mounting that the other Piper aircraft and the alternatives were Wag Aero, Clarence Witte and Dakota Cub. Wag Aero sold out and the PA12 tanks are in limbo. Clearance Witte passed and his tanks have been through a number of hands and as far as I know are not yet approved and Dakota Cub's tanks require reconfiguring the tank bay in the wing. I got lucky and found a Witte tank years ago when I had an original terne plate tank that had rotted out on a customers PA14.So stop using stock old tanks. Plenty of options.
How can they be considered "owner produced" if they are not made of the same original material? It's my understanding that owner produced must conform to the original drawings.It is my understanding that Atlee Dodge is making a run of aluminum PA12 tanks as direct copies of the original turnplate tanks as owner produced.
The same way they are doing owner produced parts for the skins on Bonanza’s. It’s fairly hard to find sheetmetal magnesium. They approved it that way.Steve,
How can they be considered "owner produced" if they are not made of the same original material? It's my understanding that owner produced must conform to the original drawings.
Does sheetmetal magnesium have the same physical and chemical properties as aluminum? If yes or no, I would be expected to provide some proof of compliance. This is not a simple owner produced part. Someone must have received some sort of FAA's blessing in order to cover the responsibility of placing his/her A&P number next to his signature.The same way they are doing owner produced parts for the skins on Bonanza’s. It’s fairly hard to find sheetmetal magnesium. They approved it that way.
You’d need to ask the DAR that approved this for 100’s of Beech aircraft.Does sheetmetal magnesium have the same physical and chemical properties as aluminum? If yes or no, I would be expected to provide some proof of compliance. This is not a simple owner produced part. Someone must have received some sort of FAA's blessing in order to cover the responsibility of placing his/her A&P number next to his signature.
"(a) Materials and services used in the fabrication process should be properly identified and inspected to ensure that they conform to the applicable design data, including their physical and chemical properties, and other characteristics affecting airworthiness."
So someone claimed the prize for replacing magnesium skins on V tailed Bonanzas?You’d need to ask the DAR that approved this for 100’s of Beech aircraft.
You answered your own statement. It's DAR approved. That is a form of FAA approval, not strictly an owner produced part. The same would apply if Atlee Dodge makes PA-12 tanks. Then if Atlee Dodge makes them and sells them, he would need an FAA-PMA approval.You’d need to ask the DAR that approved this for 100’s of Beech aircraft.
Concur, changing the material makes this an "Alteration", so yes it is an "Owner Produced Part" but it is also an "Alteration of the original design. Now you need to answer if it is a Major Alteration that would require "Approved Data" and a 337 or a Minor Alteration that can be done with "acceptable data" and just a log book entry.Does sheetmetal magnesium have the same physical and chemical properties as aluminum? If yes or no, I would be expected to provide some proof of compliance. This is not a simple owner produced part. Someone must have received some sort of FAA's blessing in order to cover the responsibility of placing his/her A&P number next to his signature.
"(a) Materials and services used in the fabrication process should be properly identified and inspected to ensure that they conform to the applicable design data, including their physical and chemical properties, and other characteristics affecting airworthiness."
I think Beech did the approval for Aluminum skins. Not 100% sure but later Bonanzas do have AL skins.You’d need to ask the DAR that approved this for 100’s of Beech aircraft.
You don't necessarily need PMA if the purchaser complies with one of the five attributes for an owner produced part identified in the 1995 FAA memo.You answered your own statement. It's DAR approved. That is a form of FAA approval, not strictly an owner produced part. The same would apply if Atlee Dodge makes PA-12 tanks. Then if Atlee Dodge makes them and sells them, he would need an FAA-PMA approval.
My interpretation of changing from magnesium to aluminum in the field is here:Concur, changing the material makes this an "Alteration", so yes it is an "Owner Produced Part" but it is also an "Alteration of the original design. Now you need to answer if it is a Major Alteration that would require "Approved Data" and a 337 or a Minor Alteration that can be done with "acceptable data" and just a log book entry.
In the case of Atlee fuel tanks....What did the owner provide?You don't necessarily need PMA if the purchaser complies with one of the five attributes for an owner produced part identified in the 1995 FAA memo.
1. The owner provided the manufacturer with design or performance data from
which to manufacture the part. (This may occur, for instance, where a person provided
a part to the manufacturer and asked that the part be duplicated.)
2. The owner provided the manufacturer with materials from which to manufacture
the part.
3. The owner provided the manufacturer with fabrication processes or assembly
methods to be used in the manufacture of the part.
4. The owner provided the manufacturer with quality control procedures to be
used in the manufacture of the part.
5. The owner supervised the manufacturer of the part.
If the owner provided drawings or instructions for the manufacture of the tank they complied with #1In the case of Atlee fuel tanks....What did the owner provide?