• If You Are Having Trouble Logging In with Your Old Username and Password, Please use this Forgot Your Password link to get re-established.
  • Hey! Be sure to login or register!

New kid on the block - Smith Cub

Lost 1 year!!!

Yeap! 1 year down the drain…I learned the hard way about primer & paint!! As you may know, I covered my Cub using the Stewart System. I have followed all the steps up to the paint. After reading a bunch of reviews about painting with this system, people mentioned that it was difficult, and the application was different than enamel / epoxy / urethane since you need to use the fog/wet coat technique which is odd to all the gents that I’ve talked to.

I had seen interesting videos from Robbie Staton (Airtech Coating) about his paint system. I ask Robbie if I could use his primer and paint with the Stewart system. He was honest and he just did not know if I could apply it on. He suggested that I should make a frame, covered it, and follow all the steps up to where I am with the cub. So, I ask him to send me a quart of primer and paint to test it on the covered frame. Before applying the primer, the surface was sanded with 320 grit and cleaned. Primer & paint held strongly to the fabric. I have tried to sand it, peel off the paint with an X-Acto blade, scratch it, pour solvent on it…nothing I could do to remove it. I was happy about it and ordered primer from Airtech Coating and some Poly-Fiber paint from Aircraft Spruce since that there both polyurethane bases.

Primer and paint when on well and I were satisfied with the result except for one little paint run on the belly close to the landing gear location. Ann (wife) was giving me a hand with sanding between coats and we she saw that paint run she insisted to get rid of it by using a Nib file from Steck. So, she rubbed the run very carefully and after couple minutes, probably due to friction, a bubble appeared. I cut it open and noticed that the primer was not adhering to the Stewart System primer. I pulled the side of the bubble and the paint started to peel off!!!

I was horrified. What to do? I assessed another location, same result! Could I sand it down and repaint it? The primer & paint would stick very strongly to the tapes but not to other area. Now I tested the wings with the same problems. I could only visualize this aircraft with its new paint scheme sitting in the sun and bubbles popping up all over!

Well, after 3 sleepless nights, whichever way you look at it, the mishap was caught on time. I decided to remove all the fabric and glue and do it all over again! At this time, an unimaginable thing happened…Ann said that if I agreed to work only from 09:00 am to noon (6 days a week) she would team up with me to do whatever is necessary to recover the cub!! Well, she kept her words, and we did the job within a year.

This time, one system only! I choose Airtech Coating and using only their product. So far so good and Robbie has a great customer service.

Here is a comparison chart between the two covering jobs.

First covering job: August 19,2020 – Dec 18, 2021

Second covering job: May 01,2023 – April 23,2024

FABRIC
Hours To Complete Controls
2023
2020
Elevators
51.0 Hrs
53.0 Hrs
Stabilizers
47.5 Hrs
35.0 Hrs
Rudder
30.0 Hrs
33.5 Hrs
Gear Legs
22.5 Hrs
35.0 Hrs
Hours To Complete Fuselage
2023
2021
Fuselage
150.0 Hrs
139 Hrs
Hours To Complete Wings
2024
2021
Left Wing
114.0 Hrs
151.0 Hrs
Right Wing
153.0 Hrs
173.0 Hrs
Hours To Complete Ailerons
2024
2020
Both Ailerons
88.0 Hrs
58.5.0 Hrs
Hours To Complete Flaps
2024
2020
Both Flaps
49.5 Hrs
63.0 Hrs
Total Hours To Complete Aircraft
2024
2020
TOTAL HOURS
705.5 Hrs
741.0 Hrs

Getting ready for the next step: Primer & Paint!!


More to follow!

Dan
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5811.webp
    IMG_5811.webp
    229.9 KB · Views: 40
  • IMG_5813.webp
    IMG_5813.webp
    531.9 KB · Views: 36
  • IMG_5808.webp
    IMG_5808.webp
    604.8 KB · Views: 39
  • IMG_5886.webp
    IMG_5886.webp
    868.8 KB · Views: 36
  • IMG_5900.webp
    IMG_5900.webp
    949.6 KB · Views: 34
  • IMG_5902.webp
    IMG_5902.webp
    1.5 MB · Views: 31
  • IMG_5905.webp
    IMG_5905.webp
    1.6 MB · Views: 30
  • IMG_5909.webp
    IMG_5909.webp
    2 MB · Views: 30
  • IMG_5960.webp
    IMG_5960.webp
    1.4 MB · Views: 29
  • IMG_5968.webp
    IMG_5968.webp
    1.6 MB · Views: 38
Last edited:
Removing Fabric...
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5948.webp
    IMG_5948.webp
    1.7 MB · Views: 21
  • IMG_5947.webp
    IMG_5947.webp
    2.1 MB · Views: 22
  • IMG_5971.webp
    IMG_5971.webp
    2 MB · Views: 25
  • IMG_5946.webp
    IMG_5946.webp
    1.9 MB · Views: 23
  • IMG_5943.webp
    IMG_5943.webp
    1.6 MB · Views: 23
New Fabric
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6095.webp
    IMG_6095.webp
    1.4 MB · Views: 40
  • IMG_6823.webp
    IMG_6823.webp
    630.5 KB · Views: 36
  • IMG_7035.webp
    IMG_7035.webp
    457 KB · Views: 33
  • IMG_7034.webp
    IMG_7034.webp
    949.3 KB · Views: 33
  • IMG_6641.webp
    IMG_6641.webp
    1.8 MB · Views: 35
  • IMG_6663.webp
    IMG_6663.webp
    1.8 MB · Views: 31
  • IMG_6744.webp
    IMG_6744.webp
    2.1 MB · Views: 35
  • IMG_6215.webp
    IMG_6215.webp
    2.1 MB · Views: 30
  • IMG_6357.webp
    IMG_6357.webp
    1.6 MB · Views: 45
Oh no! That would be so depressing - glad you pulled through and the result will be great and you will be happy. Dang..making me think more and more about Oratex.
 
Dan, I hear your pain. Your wife and you make a good team. I'm sure it will look even better the second time.
I might hire you for my next covering job ;)

How did you remove the blue Stewart glue before re-covering?

What are your thoughts about the the AirTech glue compare to the Stewart ?




I did mix products one time with good results: Endura polyurethane top coat over Stewart Ekofill-primer over bare fabric.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2970.webp
    IMG_2970.webp
    579.5 KB · Views: 28
  • IMG_2985.webp
    IMG_2985.webp
    356.4 KB · Views: 27
Oh no! That would be so depressing - glad you pulled through and the result will be great and you will be happy. Dang..making me think more and more about Oratex.
Scott, once the decision is made and you make peace with it...You just go back to the ''Fun to build something'' mindset .
 
Dan, I hear your pain. Your wife and you make a good team. I'm sure it will look even better the second time.
I might hire you for my next covering job ;)

How did you remove the blue Stewart glue before re-covering?

What are your thoughts about the the AirTech glue compare to the Stewart ?




I did mix products one time with good results: Endura polyurethane top coat over Stewart Ekofill-primer over bare fabric.
Oli, Thanks!
Concerning the Stewart Glue, we used a rod and wrapped it with masking tape backward on it really tight. It worked for large area. For the hard to get places, we used a rubber Belt Cleaning Stick by rubbing the glue off. Took about 150 hours to remove all the glue...Just don't want to do this again!!
Airtech Glue: First of all , once the glue is diluted with reducer, the smell almost dissepear. Mind you we worked in a fair size hangar, it helps! I really enjoy working with the Stewart System but I think that the Airtech glue sticks more strongly to the parts. I tested the glue on a sample before starting the job on the aircraft and I tell you it was hell to remove it! Stewart System glue is pretty well like rubber, that's why we could remove it with masking tape. you could not do that with Airtech...
Beautiful aircraft Oli you've got there. I'm glad that you did not run into my problems!! Also a nice series of pictures included, thanks!
Dan

 
Hello Dan!
My name is Alois Mayr. I am from Austria/Europe.
I have read the construction of your Smith Cub with attention and congratulate you on your wonderful aircraft!
Forgive me, for writing to you like this.
A friend and I, bought 2 Super Cub Kits from Nick Smith in Canada.
Unfortunately we didn't get any usable documents for the approval from Nick Smith.
Maybe you can help us.
The Canadian authority will probably require the same tests and documents for the certification of an experimental aircraft as the EASA in Europe.

We would of course pay for your trouble!

Our authority requires documents such as
  • "Strength verification for the main structure, wings and fuselage",
  • "Rated weights and center of gravity positions",
  • "Proof of stability",
  • "Proof of flutter safety"
Thank‘s a lot!

Alois und Jozi
 
Last edited:
Dan, I'm interested in your experience using another paint over Stewarts covering. I have two questions
Why do you think your test panel results were different from the final aircraft results?
You say that you sprayed Airtech primer and paint over Stewarts primer. Was this over their Ekoprime or did you go over their Ekofill with Airtech primer?
I don't know much about Airtech primer but it seems there is some incompatibility between it and the Ekofill/Ekoprime. Is it possible the Eko was not fully cured?, that all the water had not left the surface? Otherwise I'm not sure why another product would not stick.
Thanks for the honest write up.
 
Hello Dan!
My name is Alois Mayr. I am from Austria/Europe.
I have read the construction of your Smith Cub with attention and congratulate you on your wonderful aircraft!
Forgive me, for writing to you like this.
A friend and I, bought 2 Super Cub Kits from Nick Smith in Canada.
Unfortunately we didn't get any usable documents for the approval from Nick Smith.
Maybe you can help us.
The Canadian authority will probably require the same tests and documents for the certification of an experimental aircraft as the EASA in Europe.

We would of course pay for your trouble!

Our authority requires documents such as
  • "Strength verification for the main structure, wings and fuselage",
  • "Rated weights and center of gravity positions",
  • "Proof of stability",
  • "Proof of flutter safety"
Thank‘s a lot!

Alois und Jozi
Alois,
Nice to hear from pilots flying in Europe and buildings Cubs!
In Canada, unless I'm wrong, there are no requirements to provide documents concerning flutter, stability or the strength of a structure such as fuselage / wings etc...Except for the Weigh & Balance calculation. I would guess that for an aircraft to certify as airworthy, a flutter and stability test is carried out in a wind tunnel at max speed and disturbances are introduced to the airflow to see how the structure and controls withstand such vibrations before breaking. Not sure is any of the test were done to the PA-18...Interesthing points that you brought there. My youngest son is an Aeronautical Engineer, I will submit your points to him and see what king of calculations he can come up with. I'll get back to you... Dan
 
Dan, I'm interested in your experience using another paint over Stewarts covering. I have two questions
Why do you think your test panel results were different from the final aircraft results?
You say that you sprayed Airtech primer and paint over Stewarts primer. Was this over their Ekoprime or did you go over their Ekofill with Airtech primer?
I don't know much about Airtech primer but it seems there is some incompatibility between it and the Ekofill/Ekoprime. Is it possible the Eko was not fully cured?, that all the water had not left the surface? Otherwise I'm not sure why another product would not stick.
Thanks for the honest write up.
Bearhawk,
I really don't know why it did work on the test panel and was a disaster on the fuselage...Let me tell you I really tried to figure out the problem. The fuselage was done exactly like the test panel, 1st coat of diluted glue followed by 3 coats of Ekofill (sanding between coats) THEN Airtech primer. Obviously, it is not about Airtech product but rather the compatibility between Polyurethane over waterborne base. It would be nice to know if we have any Cub drivers that have mixed a waterborne base coat with a polyurethane top coat??? To answer your question, the Ekofill had cured at least 3 weeks before applying Airtech primer. I can only conclude at this moment that when you start your project with one system, you stick to it 'till the end. Dan
 
Alois,
Nice to hear from pilots flying in Europe and buildings Cubs!
In Canada, unless I'm wrong, there are no requirements to provide documents concerning flutter, stability or the strength of a structure such as fuselage / wings etc...Except for the Weigh & Balance calculation. I would guess that for an aircraft to certify as airworthy, a flutter and stability test is carried out in a wind tunnel at max speed and disturbances are introduced to the airflow to see how the structure and controls withstand such vibrations before breaking. Not sure is any of the test were done to the PA-18...Interesthing points that you brought there. My youngest son is an Aeronautical Engineer, I will submit your points to him and see what king of calculations he can come up with. I'll get back to you... Dan
Dan,
Thank you very much for your effort!
Alois
 
Back
Top