• If You Are Having Trouble Logging In with Your Old Username and Password, Please use this Forgot Your Password link to get re-established.
  • Hey! Be sure to login or register!

How agresively do you lean?

JMBreitinger

Registered User
Minneapolis, MN
After a few long cross-countries last week, I am getting to know my engine a little better. I am finding that if I lean 'til the RPM drops and richen it up a bit, I am running slightly lean of peak and very hot. I can not get far enough on the lean side to see temps drop. Most of my flying is 1,500 - 2,000 MSL. At full rich 2,500 RPM, it burns about 10 GPH. Leaned as described, it is 8 - 8.6 GPH.

What is the best practice?

On hot days, I am having a hard time keeping CHTs below 400. I am seeing up to 415 at 2,500 RPM when leaned.
 
John,

First thing I'd do is back off on the rpm a little. 2500 is a lot of power, in my opinion. I usually run these engines at around 2400 or less, though a lot of folks run them at higher rpms, and Lycoming says that's fine.

As to leaning, I've been around and around with this, in discussions with Lycoming, and several of their tech reps. Their consistent response is DON'T try to use a four probe EGT to lean these small carbureted engines. Use the EGT to diagnose problems, maybe, but....

The problem is that the fuel distribution is so uneven in a carbureted engine(as I'm sure you've noted) that it's nearly impossible to lean that way. When you have the first cylinder to peak at the selected EGT, all the other cylinders are so far off that this technique just gets frustrating.

Lycoming reps recommend the old "pull it till it pops" method of leaning: At cruise, lean the mixture till you hear the engine starving for fuel, then richen the mixture until the engine smooths out, basically.

In my experience, this procedure will put the first cylinder to peak a little on the lean side, so I richen a little further, just to be "comfortable".

Remember, Lycoming says you can run these engines all the time at peak EGT. Lycoming does not, however, recommend running their engines lean of peak, with a few model exceptions.

Your fuel flows sound about right for the power you're using, and that low altitude.

Also remember that Lycoming doesn't recommend leaning in the climb below 5,000 feet.

I've run these engines to TBO around the coast of Alaska without ever leaning, for that matter, but the 100 octane engines tend to foul plugs pretty bad if you don't lean. If you're having fouling problems, be sure to try the Lycoming recommended shutdown procedures, as described in their booklet, Key Reprints, available from them.

MTV
 
Bought a cub with a vernier mixture knob and a cht/egt gauge. Works really good for that fine adjustment. I don't think 400 cht is to hot but 500 is, also I can adjust right up to 1400 on the egt which I think is optimum. Never did like the "pull the knob till it slows down the push in slightly " approach.
 
John,

Check this out, http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/182084-1.html
He's one of the Guys behind "Advanced Pilot Seminars" that advocate Lean of Peak ops. No old wives tales, chicken bones or smoke and mirrors, just hard data to back up their position.
I run lean of peak all the time in both the Super Cruiser(0320) and the 182 (0470), no problem. Takes alittle knowhow and a little luck and perserverance to get a air tight induction system and solid ignition. I routinely get my EGT differentials down below 40 degrees on carbureted engines, so I know it can be done.

Jerry,

Just a heads up but, but Aluminum starts loose it's strength rapidly over 400 degrees. The APS guys reccomend 400 as a max temp and 380 as a peak cruising temp. I know Lycoming and Continental say 475 to 500 is max but APS has some data to suggest otherwise. I f nothing else it's more conservative and surely couldn't hurt.
 
I also fly about 1500 msl all the time, with my 0-360. I lean about 25 to 50 rich of peek. I also keep the mixture pulled to a lean condition during ground operation. I also don't use carb heat. I verify that the carb heat works every time I approach the pattern. I puled my plugs today cause I just put on my new woody prop, and the plugs could not look better. Like toast. These Lycs on carbs run rich.
My 2 cents.
 
I always lean at any altitude. 100LL has too much lead in it and will form "clinkers" or foul your plugs if you don't.

I pull the mixture out till the engine runs rough then shove it in 1/4". It will also give you about 10% less fuel burn.
 
I agree with Mike V,
Unless you are running an injected engine with Gami injectors, you are asking for trouble by going lean of peak.

My buddy does it here with his C-210 with Gami's. Sure he saved all sorts of gas, but his valves are about toast.

I would rather run a little rich of peak in a carbureted engine, maybe it will burn a little more gas, but that is cheap compared to an engine.
 
Note that the guys in Texas don't talk much about Lycoming engines. For one thing, the induction system in injected Lycomings is already about as good as it gets, unlike Continental. And these guys are selling injectors, not advice.

Also, they are pretty conservative recommending lean of peak ops in carbureted engines.

Again, Lycoming says you can run their engines AT peak, but not lean of peak. Their argument is that LOP operations in these engines can cause detonation. GAMI says detonation isn't possible in these engines. That is probably true in a properly tuned and timed engine.

Anyone ever seen a GA engine out of time?

I've run Continental LOP a good bit, and they seem to do well. I believe most of what the GAMI guys claim to be true. Some of their stuff is just a little too esoteric for a country boy like me, though.

MTV
 
I lean my 160 all the time and it looks like its burning under 7 gph. Couple weeks ago I flew 3:35 on the right tank and put in 23.1 gallons. Flew mostly at 2500 rpm including 4 take offs.
 
Alex,

That's what I used to think also, but it's just not true and their data proves it. There are alot of us doing it with carbureted engines. Walter Atkinson And George Braly are the other two Instructors at APS and they have taught alot of us otherwise.Low EGT differentials are the key to smooth LOP ops. Burned valve are from poor construction not lean of peak ops. A question for you, what is the difference between 50 degrees lean of peak and 50 rich of peak? Answer, none. And Lycoming says itr's ok to run 50 or less all the way to peak egt. There's alot of misinformation out there about LOP ops and for that matter engine ops in general.

Here's another couple of links that covers it very well if your interested.


http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/182155-1.html

http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/182179-1.html
 
Mike,

"Also, they are pretty conservative recommending lean of peak ops in carbureted engines"

I'm not sure I agree with that, if anything, maybe not any more.
George and Walter are on the Cessna Pilot Association Website almost daily saying otherrwise now. There alot of us doing it with carbureted engines with their blessing. The key to LOP ops is low EGT diferentials, period. According to them, all conforming internal combustion gasoline engines can be run LOP, safely. Carbureted or Injected.


BTW it's Ada, OK.
 
I'm a mechanic so that means I only get about 40% of the test questions right at an APS seminar so I have a question. Why do you want to run lean of peak? Is it better for the engine or to save gas or both? I just installed 4 new LyCon flow matched cylinders on an O-360 for an ld time customer that went to their school. We have spent more time messsing with what I thought was a perfectly good engine because the engine monitor doesn't agree with what the guys at APS. Compressions are good, oil consumption is good and power seems good. Only thing wrong is it runs 412-418 degrees on two cylinders and 380s on the other two. No metal, oil analysis is good. I give up.
 
OK, call me a fool, but I generally follow what my Lycoming Manual says.

First off, if you have a 0-320B2B 160hp, the charts say 2450 RPM at Sea Level is 75% power. Higher altitudes and RPM is less to get 75%. Lycoming recommends leaning at 75% power or BELOW at any altitude (used to be 5,000MSL or below, but they changed it). So MikeV and Steve are right.. back your power setting off to 75% prior to doing any leaning.

Second, maximum CHT is 425F, and that limit must be followed if it cannot be maintained. So if leaning and you haven't reached peak yet, but CHT go over 425F, stop leaning and enrichen mixture until CHT comes below MAX level. Fuel is a wasted but cylinders are saved. If you cannot maintain MAX CHT with full rich, I would guess you have an installation issue with baffling, cowling or something like that or it is too gar darn hot out to be flying that cub. But sounds like you are running just below MAX CHT at 415F if your CHT is calibrated correctly (you did do that first to check your instrument?!).

Third, what the heck is kase doing with running his engine at 2900 RPM!! That should mandate a tear down as it is 200 RPM over redline.

BTW, I have a vernier style mixture control and digital CHT/EGT and tach. These all really help with leaning for sure. With the new Millineum Investment cast cylinders I have not seen a CHT over 330F, even during initial 10 hours. In the winter they stay 300F or so, summer 325F even at peak leaning. With the same installation and my last engine, I would routinely push 400F CHT, so I think a great deal is the proper custom overhaul I got, plus the MII cylinders. Cowling and baffling and instrumentation remained the same.
 
Them engines dont know the difference between 2700 or 2900. What if your tach is off 200 rpm?
 
Steve,

Actually both, better for the engine because it runs cleaner and cooler and of course it saves fuel.

Well I'm certainly not a mechanic but I'd bet it may be a carburetor problem. I had a similar problem and I went through 3 carbs from Precision that were too lean. Finally had it fixed locally, you can PM for details if you'd like. If he has an engine monitor you should be seeing EGT's around 1250-1300 at take-off and initial climbout at sea level. Anything more than that and your not getting enough fuel.
 
For my O-320 Lyc, I lean to max RPM at any altitude except takeoff. I figure that has to be max power which is usually on the rich side of max EGT.
Regarding Continential 360's and 520's, I agree w/ CPA. Its not too lean that burns up exhaust valves, it running too rich which results in lead buildup on valve stems. That gets pulled causes premature wear on valve guide. Once that starts, the valve will wobble and not seat squarely. Then it's subject to blow-by and that is what burns the face.
Chris
 
I buy GAMIs reasoning with tuned injectors. I can see how it should work as long as you have the capability to analyse each cylinder via an engine monitoring system.

I can not see how you can get perfectly even fuel distribution with a carbureted engine.

I ran a 0-320 to 3700 hours with lots of oil changes, (straight weight), and running a good deal cooler rich of peak. The only problem I ever had with that engine was lead in the plugs. That engine is still being flown today in Nevada, after being topped.
 
I may have given the wrong impression here -- I am not an advocate of running lean of peak.

We have GAMIs in our Mooney and have done a lot of experimentation. I do buy what Braly preaches but found that the fuel burn is a pretty good indication of power output. Our Continental TSIO 360 LB will run great lean of peak. CHTs drop nicely, fuel flow drops too and, with it, power output. Braly encourages running a higher power setting since all of the temps are so low on the lean side. While I accept the logic, I am back to nearly the same fuel flow for comparable speed so I don't see the benefit. Ours is a first generation turbo and gets touchy in this configuration. I like better margins and the greater simplicity of running rich of peak.

I agree 100% with Mike that the degree of precision that I am measuring in the Cub is ridiculous given the equipment. What I am seeing is that some cylinders are on the lean side and some rich so overall I am probably right about peak using the lean it 'til it coughs method.

Most of the time, I run at 2,350 or 2,400. At 2,350 down low, everything runs right where I like it. I like flying this airplane low around here where the terrain is mostly flat and open. I often follow the contour at 300 to 500 AGL which means a lot of subtle maneuvering, causing RPM to fluctuate 75 - 100 either way. It has not taken long to get in synch with this engine I can usually make the change necessary without looking at the tach to keep it within 25.

On my couple of longer trips, I have experimented with various power settings just to see where it goes, hence my observations about temps at 2,500.

I love the engine monitor just because it does help diagnose the general health of the engine. I know what fuel flow to expect, what spread between cylinders, which ones ought to be hottest and find comfort in that. I have no illusions about being able to fine tune it to the point Braly suggest for injected Continentals.
 
A friend bought a twin Commache years ago with 110 hours on it since new with 160hp 0-320s. The plane and engines have 3100 hours now and he always runs at peak and at 2450rpms. The guy is an A+P and IA so I'm a believer of leaning

Tim
 
WSH,

I can't disagree with Braly and Co. reference leaning a carbureted engine to LOP IF it is set up with EGT's very even. I've never met one, and frankly, I'm not going to pay a mechanic (or annoy a mechanic, as Steve points out) for hours and hours of chasing that very elusive goal. Even with that, you will NEVER approach the even-ness of an injected engines EGT's.

My point was and is, that the way most carbureted engines are set up, and the way most pilots operate them, LOP ops just aren't in the cards.

John B. also brings up a very salient point: As the engine goes LOP, power is reduced. So, you increase power to regain some of what's lost, which increases fuel flows. Running LOP does reduce fuel flows for a given speed, but not by as much as most folks would have you believe.

The Ada guys (thanks for the reminder) are approaching cult status, to the point where nothing anyone else says is valid.

Again, read the Lycoming bulletins. They specifically state not to run their engines LOP, again, with certain very specific model number exceptions. See the Lycoming flyer: "The New Old Leaning Technique" for Lycomings view on LOP ops in THEIR engines.

Now, I specifically asked a Lycoming rep if running one of their engines which was under warranty LOP would void the warranty, and his response was "no".

Continental, on the other hand, permits LOP operations on virtually all their injected engines, and recommends it on some.

I'm not agin LOP operations, but they have to be done very carefully, the engine HAS TO BE MONITORED VERY CAREFULLY by the pilot at all times, because a slight change in temperature or altitude can change the picture pretty fast, and as noted, if carbureted, the engine has to be really tweaked to make it work at all. Finally, you must use a multi probe EGT nad CHT gauge, and I don't mean one that can be cycled manually. You need a graphic analyzer.

I've got an O=360 that runs 140 to 150 between cylinders on EGT. I've been trying to get a mechanic to improve that for several years now, but I'm not willing to tear down a good running engine for that purpose.

MTV
 
Didn't the Lycoming / Malibu installation specify LOP?

I know that the new turbocharged Columbias do prescribe it. I think they use Continentals.

My experience is that to get back to the power required to maintain same speed on the lean side puts you into real interesting territory. I think that this can only be done on turbo super-charged engines and Mike is right that even a small change in any temp, pressure, RPM, airspeed can trigger bootstrapping. These excursions at high power settings can cause real problems. This is not a conservative approach.
 
Mike

"I can't disagree with Braly and Co. reference leaning a carbureted engine to LOP IF it is set up with EGT's very even. I've never met one, and frankly, I'm not going to pay a mechanic (or annoy a mechanic, as Steve points out) for hours and hours of chasing that very elusive goal. Even with that, you will NEVER approach the even-ness of an injected engines EGT's"

Both of mine do it very well and I had to do very little and it was hardly elusive. Tighten a hose clamp here and there and change. a bad plug that could'nt pass the LOP mag check. That's it, no big deal . Again, I'm paraphrasing alittle, Every conforming internal cumbustion gasoline engine can be run lean of peak, Everyone! APS say anything less than 70 degree EGT differentials is fine for smooth LOP ops, mine are often less than 40 and occasionally in the 20 to 30 range. You'd think it was injected and there dozen's of us or more on the CPA website who are doing it daily. Works like a champ.

"My point was and is, that the way most carbureted engines are set up, and the way most pilots operate them, LOP ops just aren't in the cards"

Not true, See the above. Tell you what Mike I'll pay for an annual membership for you to join the Cessna Pilot Association website if you'll take the time to do a couple of searches and read the threads by Walter and George on LOP ops.I'm going to warn you though you can spend a couple of hours a night for weeks catching up. But for anyone willing to do that they lay out for you, for free! .I've learned alot from you here and in your articles in the last couple of years, more than you'll ever know, but from what I see you only have half the picture about LOP ops..And it's the bad half!
.

"John B. also brings up a very salient point: As the engine goes LOP, power is reduced. So, you increase power to regain some of what's lost, which increases fuel flows. Running LOP does reduce fuel flows for a given speed, but not by as much as most folks would have you believe."

If done properly you lose about 2% of your cruise speed, about 3 or 4 knots with the planes we're flying, and save 2 to 2.5 gallons per hour. Again, properly is important. Most newbies lean more than nessecary and lose to much speed.Let's just say for giggles that you save 2 GPH for 2/3 of a 2,000 TBO. Over 2600 gallons saved over the life of the engine. Seems substantial to me..


"The Ada guys (thanks for the reminder) are approaching cult status, to the point where nothing anyone else says is valid".

Mike ove the last year I've seen everything you, Alex and John haves said again and again on the CPA website and the APS guys have patiently refuted everything with hard data, all free for anyone willing to read a little. Their take on it as I see it is, LOP is it's just another tool that you can utilize when you need it, if you don't need it then run ROP if it suits your mission.

"Again, read the Lycoming bulletins. They specifically state not to run their engines LOP, again, with certain very specific model number exceptions. See the Lycoming flyer: "The New Old Leaning Technique" for Lycomings view on LOP ops in THEIR engines. "

I've read it, a couple of times actually and as George and Walter have pointed out, it had to pass through the LEGAL department.before public consumption., CYA.


"Now, I specifically asked a Lycoming rep if running one of their engines which was under warranty LOP would void the warranty, and his response was "no".
Continental, on the other hand, permits LOP operations on virtually all their injected engines, and recommends it on some."

That's right. Again, if it works on one engine it'll work on the others. The Physics are everywhere the same.

"I'm not agin LOP operations, but they have to be done very carefully, the engine HAS TO BE MONITORED VERY CAREFULLY by the pilot at all times, because a slight change in temperature or altitude can change the picture pretty fast, and as noted, if carbureted, the engine has to be really tweaked to make it work at all. Finally, you must use a multi probe EGT nad CHT gauge, and I don't mean one that can be cycled manually. You need a graphic analyzer.'

Not really, atleast according to the APS guys. If your LOP and the engine goes leaner then it gets cooler not hotter like it does when ROP. Cooler is safer. Actually LOP ops is less critical and easier on the engine than ROP if done properly. . Managing slight changes in altitude is is nothing more difficult than what you would do ROP, a little turn on the mixture in the proper direction, DONE. And as Walter and George have pointed out time and again you DON"T really need a multi probe montor to run LOP, to the contrary their postion is you should really have one if you don't , for trouble shooting and staying out of the " Red Box" when running ROP, were most of the damage is done.

"I've got an O=360 that runs 140 to 150 between cylinders on EGT. I've been trying to get a mechanic to improve that for several years now, but I'm not willing to tear down a good running engine for that purpose"

I wouldn't either. you just have a nonconforming engine. You can fix it but it'll take time, maybe alot of time or just live with it and run ROP. OTOH, Have you tried running partial carb heat once your in cruise and clean air. Alot of times that helps atomize the fuel better and bring the differentials down. Alot of the (0470) crowd finds that if they keep the carb air temp somewhere around 50 F their differentials come right inline and they can run LOP smoothly.That and of course chasing down any induction leaks, which can be extrenely difficult and often counter-intuitive..

WSH
 
John,

"My experience is that to get back to the power required to maintain same speed on the lean side puts you into real interesting territory. I think that this can only be done on turbo super-charged engines and Mike is right that even a small change in any temp, pressure, RPM, airspeed can trigger bootstrapping. These excursions at high power settings can cause real problems. This is not a conservative approach."

You and Mike could very well be right when it comes to Turbo LOP ops. I'll concede that I don't have any experience with turbo's and am way behind the curve when it comes to their operation.

I will however say the George has been running his Turbo Normalized Bonazna at 85 to 90% power LOP for more for 1500 hrs at last check without any problems. Again knowing how is obviously the key to success. But if he can do it, then you should be able too as well.
 
I don't doubt that there are some great bennefits to LOP operations. A turbo-normalized engine is a whole different kettle of fish from a turbo-supercharged engine.

Then again, I may just be too ham fisted for this.
 
John,

I believe you and I wouldn't have a clue on where to start. I wil say that you can join the Cessna Pilot Association and go to the website and get the answers you need, and more than likely directly from Walter or George. It'll be some of the best money you ever spent in Aviaiton.
 
I've got an O=360 that runs 140 to 150 between cylinders on EGT. I've been trying to get a mechanic to improve that for several years now, but I'm not willing to tear down a good running engine for that purpose.

MTV
Recognizing this is an old thread re-upped, I thought I would comment on Mike's observation. Lycomings with carburetors would have varying mixtures between cylinders depending on the throttle valve position. As the fuel/air mix leaves the carb it passes the throttle valve. When doing this, it swirls into the passages in the engine's sump. The mixture separates going though different passages to each cylinder. Some cylinders will get more fuel than others. The position of the throttle valve determines the flowing of the mixture. Only when the throttle is wide open is the swirling at a minimum creating the most balanced mixtures/EGTs.
Fuel injected engines don't have this issue since the fuel is mixed with the air at the cylinder.
 
When it comes to CHT'S here are also a factors that have not been mentioned in this 18 year old post. Baffling, intake ramps, and cowling inlet /outlet issues, Prop pitch, and magneto timing. Understanding how the economizer jet in the carb works is also useful. As with most things in life if you ask a pilot why he/she does something a certain way the answer is usually "that is how I was trained" The good thing is the site has days worth of reading on most any topic that can be found with a simple search, not only will you get lifetimes of knowledge in operation of aircraft but also proper explanation of why and how things are happening. We are very lucky indeed.
DENNY
 
Back
Top