Designed with cooperation by MIT to serve rooftop and other short landing areas is the legend I’ve always heard. Impressive performers but not very popular in Alaska. An enigma.Designed for the tropics; not North America, yes?
It seems to me that they are strictly warm and fair weather birds given the complex slats, spoilers, and flaps incorporated into Helio wings, or am I wrong again?
There was a brief re-start or new start of Helio production back in the 1980's...... there are reliability issue(s) with the thirsty geared reduction engine ......
I don't think they had a specific area of the world in mind when the designed the aircraft. They happen to fit the CIA/MAF missions well. The designers just wanted a great STOL aircraft started with a PA 17 and MIT backing went for it.Designed for the tropics; not North America, yes?
It seems to me that they are strictly warm and fair weather birds given the complex slats, spoilers, and flaps incorporated into Helio wings, or am I wrong again?
Tell that to Wright Air Service in FAI….Designed for the tropics; not North America, yes?
It seems to me that they are strictly warm and fair weather birds given the complex slats, spoilers, and flaps incorporated into Helio wings, or am I wrong again?
Great question... but who would have thought a $600,000 cub would have over a years waiting list to get from the factory?I wonder about the economics of this start-up. Is there a market for million dollar experimental Helios? Who’ll insure them and at what price? It’ll be interesting to see it play out.
They own the type certificate, wouldn’t be any point in owning that unless they want to certify it. With that, all they need is to demonstrate conformity and get a production cert. Both of which are huge tasks, but look what they’ve done so far.I wonder about the economics of this start-up. Is there a market for million dollar experimental Helios? Who’ll insure them and at what price? It’ll be interesting to see it play out.
Supporting the current fleet would be a reason. In any case, I’ve got no reason to argue against any more than any of you have reason to argue for this enterprise. I’m a businessman. I see P&Ls and balance sheets, not the romance of my imagination. I think it’ll be interesting to observe. Bottom line? I’m a slat wing owner and I have no interest in Helios, and that after coming very close to buying one.They own the type certificate, wouldn’t be any point in owning that unless they want to certify it. With that, all they need is to demonstrate conformity and get a production cert. Both of which are huge tasks, but look what they’ve done so far.
Oh, and have you noted the price of new carbon cubs?
Here's a link to the 1984 Flying magazine issue, you have to scroll down quite a ways to the Helip article.There was a brief re-start or new start of Helio production back in the 1980's.
I have an old magazine with an article about it but it's at the hangar so I can't quote it.
They decided to use non-geared Lycoming engines, IO-540 & IO-720 as I recall.
This history page from the Helio Alaska website mentions that down toward the bottom.