Good day folks
I’m considering making my experimental Cub stand for some TLC. I’m currently running a O-320 150hp with a 74” Sensenich cruise prop. Long term plan is to upgrade to a 180hp with a proper pulling prop
One of the first things I want to focus on is power delivery. On takeoff I get about 2400RPM which means I get airborne with just over 100hp. I can probably repitch my current prop for higher RPM, but the cruise speed will be sacrificed. So I probably want the best of both worlds? This leaves me with one option- constant speed. But now, hydraulic constant speed props are heavy, expensive and they take the original Cub spinner look away. So, only one option left - Electric VP/Constant Speed. But where?
Here in South Africa we have a company AXSport that specializes in building electric constant speed props. They also build their own LSA composite aerobatic airplane
One of the props they build is a 74” 3 blade specifically for the Lycoming O-320/360 engines. So for the same price(maybe a bit less) than a Mac Borer, you can have a composite 3 blade constant speed prop. But is it worth it?
My goal is to pull all the available power out of the engine on takeoff. What would your opinion be?
Maccauley Borer 82” at 2500RPM compared to the 74” 3 blade at 2700RPM? I.o.w. will the composite prop pull harder because of the full rpm/power and surface area(3 blades) or will the Borer pull harder due to the longer diameter?
Will the constant speed really cruise much faster?
Will the constant speed prop be more efficient?
I’m considering making my experimental Cub stand for some TLC. I’m currently running a O-320 150hp with a 74” Sensenich cruise prop. Long term plan is to upgrade to a 180hp with a proper pulling prop
One of the first things I want to focus on is power delivery. On takeoff I get about 2400RPM which means I get airborne with just over 100hp. I can probably repitch my current prop for higher RPM, but the cruise speed will be sacrificed. So I probably want the best of both worlds? This leaves me with one option- constant speed. But now, hydraulic constant speed props are heavy, expensive and they take the original Cub spinner look away. So, only one option left - Electric VP/Constant Speed. But where?
Here in South Africa we have a company AXSport that specializes in building electric constant speed props. They also build their own LSA composite aerobatic airplane
One of the props they build is a 74” 3 blade specifically for the Lycoming O-320/360 engines. So for the same price(maybe a bit less) than a Mac Borer, you can have a composite 3 blade constant speed prop. But is it worth it?
My goal is to pull all the available power out of the engine on takeoff. What would your opinion be?
Maccauley Borer 82” at 2500RPM compared to the 74” 3 blade at 2700RPM? I.o.w. will the composite prop pull harder because of the full rpm/power and surface area(3 blades) or will the Borer pull harder due to the longer diameter?
Will the constant speed really cruise much faster?
Will the constant speed prop be more efficient?