• If You Are Having Trouble Logging In with Your Old Username and Password, Please use this Forgot Your Password link to get re-established.
  • Hey! Be sure to login or register!

Lighweight Accessory Preferences

mvivion

mvivion

SPONSOR
Bozeman,MT
What's the current preference for lightweight starters and lightweight alternators for Super Cubs? 160 hp engine, late model Cub.

Asking for a friend.

MTV
 
My B&C alternator continues to purr along at 1600 hours.


Sent from my iPhone using SuperCub.Org
 
mvivion said:
What's the current preference for lightweight starters and lightweight alternators for Super Cubs? 160 hp engine, late model Cub.

Asking for a friend.

MTV
Click to expand...

BTW... Are the title round B&C accessory case alternators approved for standard category now?
 
I like Sky-Tec starters and B&C or Plane-Power alternators, especially the direct drive stuff. As far as being 'approved' make sure the installation meets the requirements of CAR3 or CAR4 as applicable, then log entry. When CAR3/CAR4 were developed, there were no STC's, PMA's, etc.

Web
 
I prefer Skytek starters, B&C case mounted alternators, Niagara coolers, and Whirlwind props. No criticism for B&C belt-driven alternators or starters. Have had them, too. They work great. Have a B&C alternator on the Cessna.
 
mvivion said:
What's the current preference for lightweight starters and lightweight alternators for Super Cubs? 160 hp engine, late model Cub.

Asking for a friend.

MTV
Click to expand...

Also, add up the total electrical load for the aircraft systems (actual amps during use, not breaker size). And if you go with LED lighting, you'll be amazed at how small of an alternator you'll need.

Web
 
wireweinie said:
I like Sky-Tec starters and B&C or Plane-Power alternators, especially the direct drive stuff. As far as being 'approved' make sure the installation meets the requirements of CAR3 or CAR4 as applicable, then log entry. When CAR3/CAR4 were developed, there were no STC's, PMA's, etc.

Web
Click to expand...

Not quite true, every 337 filed before October 1955 was a “field Approval”. The regulations covering alterations and repairs are covered under CAR 18. There was no delineation between major or minor alterations. All 337s were signed by a CAA inspector. That’s why any 337 before October 1955 are considered the same as STCs, they were approved by the CAA.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
dgapilot said:
Not quite true, every 337 filed before October 1955 was a “field Approval”. The regulations covering alterations and repairs are covered under CAR 18. There was no delineation between major or minor alterations. All 337s were signed by a CAA inspector. That’s why any 337 before October 1955 are considered the same as STCs, they were approved by the CAA.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Installing a part that meets the criteria of the certification basis and doesn't fit the definition of 'major' alteration, doesn't require a 337.

Web
 
I like the SkyTec XLT on the 160 hp Cubs for weight savings, NL on the 180 hp for longevity. Never could justify the price tag on the B&C starter. I know they make great stuff, installed many of their alternators.
 
I have the same question, but for 180s. Specifically a '55 180 with a field approved O-470R. I hear conflicting stuff about the lightweight starters on bigger bore Contis - is there a consensus?
 
I think the consensus is to go with the old heavy Energizer starter and the old / classic style starter adapter.
Esp if you are running a lightweight (aka MT) prop.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
Super Cub Home Video
Replies
9
Views
4K
alaskadrifter
A
D
Engine Core & Accessory Pricing Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
Luke_theDrifter
Luke_theDrifter
S
Whats this cub worth ?
2
Replies
43
Views
14K
scott sundheim
S
JoeW
About to purchase an airplane, need HELP
Replies
17
Views
3K
Longwinglover
L
E
MT Prop photos
Replies
7
Views
4K
WhiskeyMike
WhiskeyMike
Back
Top