daedgerton
PATRON
Arlington, VA
I am working with the Sensenich engineers and planning on flight testing early December for the 150 and 160 hp
Make sure they include the A models!!!! :smile:
I am working with the Sensenich engineers and planning on flight testing early December for the 150 and 160 hp
Make sure they include the A models!!!! :smile:
Is the A model approved with the 180?
Sent from my iPhone using SuperCub.Org
Only applicable to PA-18-150, and limited to select serial numbers ( the same serial numbers listed on the TCDS for PA-18-150)
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Steve,Sensenich is working to include the lower hp Super Cubs when upgrade to 320 or 360 engines as the A models. They didn't know Super Cubs when they started this quest. The goal now after the STC is approved is to Type Certify the prop so others can STC it on other models.
Yes. The PA18A-150 is on the AML of the STC.Not to derail the thread, but on the topic of A models, Can you do a Wip 2K MGW increase on a PA-18A-150?
Sensenich is working to include the lower hp Super Cubs when upgrade to 320 or 360 engines as the A models. They didn't know Super Cubs when they started this quest. The goal now after the STC is approved is to Type Certify the prop so others can STC it on other models.
I don't know where the rumor comes from. Maybe is is true for some but hasn't been for me. Standard nosebowl and 10-1 compression. I should note that I purposely used a J-3 boot cowl when I built the crow 25 yrs ago because I think getting hot air out of the big side gills is important. Whether that actually makes a big difference or not I don't know but I ran the whirlwind last summer up to 85-90deg ambient air with cht (all 4 in the 380 to 390 deg. range) and the sensenich in the early fall up to 80 degs ambient with same results. 370 to 380 degs. Should note that my borer 82-43 ran in the same ranges. Hope I am not adding confusion to the thread. The instrument is the CGR 30P. I run a left rear baffle oil cooler position and the rear cyls run within 5 to 10 degs of each other. I did build an intake shroud and leaned the cooler back 25 yrs ago and lowered the oil temp about 15 degs with that mod. Air fills the shroud before entering the cooler for full frontal effect instead of feeding the cooler through a 3 inch hole in the baffle.
Oil temp issues.
A friend ran the Sensenich GA prop on a -12 0-360 in the summer out west and had temp issues a total of about 75 hours and with different pitch settings. He changed from Aero Shell 100 W+ to Phillips 20-50 and this made a big difference in the temps.
Then through some more investigation he has the Crosswinds STC and they use a 7 fin oil cooler where the Top Cub uses a 9 fin oil cooler and between the two planes the 9 fin runs much cooler than the 7 fin here back east both in the summer and the cooler temps 15-20 degrees.
His baffling needs some attention too!
These are what we have seen with the GA prop and the oil cooler differences.
Sent you a PMHello, Supercrow,
This is likely off topic for this thread, but your left rear baffle oil cooler comments really lit up some hope for me. At rebuild of my 0-320 in a PA-14 several years ago, we ditched the old heavy front cooler and associated long runs of hose in favor of the lighter rear one. I was warned that occasionally higher oil temps result. Sure enough, on the rare "hot" days here in south-central Alaska (aloft temps over 70F) I have to dance with my flight variables - leave the heavy stuff at home, climb to cooler temps, run rich, or stop somewhere scenic for a cool-off - in order to keep oil temps under red line. (Only happens once or twice a summer for me.) My questions to local "experts" has produced a smattering of ideas - repositioning, a top-of cowl intake vent, a dedicated intake on the nose bowl directed through some flexible heat duct, and more - without any confidence evoking consensus and with plenty of firmly believed warnings about why the other ideas won't work or are damaging.
Would you be so kind as to give me a detail description or even a picture of what you are describing with your "shroud" and "leaned back" language? All your thoughts and opinions on it would be welcome. If we are not allowed to deviate from the topic of this thread, then maybe we could go the private message route. Other folks can chime in too. Even if not sacrosanct (As John Hattie would say, "There is no such thing as immaculate perception."), opinions are worth something since everyone knows something I don't!
Thanks,
Steve
How did the prop perform on “your friends” plane compared to a metal club? I’m assuming that the weight off the nose in a -12 is where the magic happens.
Anyone put some hours on the Sensenich GA prop on 180hp SC at this point to know how it's holding up to gravel, sand, water spray? Any delamination issues?
Catto and Sensenich yes.Sensenich at standard pitch has same thrust as Catto 84x42 static. The Sensenich has a broader speed range due to the warping character of the blades. Can set blades for 2600 rpm static and not redline until about 80 mph.standard setting gives me 2350 static and I cruise at 2400 at 97 mph. Legend Cub with 340 Titan. Plane has slats and 29 Dessers.Had anyone done a comparison between the Cato, whirlwind and senenich ?
Catto and Sensenich yes.Sensenich at standard pitch has same thrust as Catto 84x42 static. The Sensenich has a broader speed range due to the warping character of the blades. Can set blades for 2600 rpm static and not redline until about 80 mph.standard setting gives me 2350 static and I cruise at 2400 at 97 mph. Legend Cub with 340 Titan. Plane has slats and 29 Dessers.