A Baffling Question...ha ha!!
I am starting on the firewall forward section of an Experimental Bearhawk Patrol. This is my first build, and am unsure what an industry standard is for securing baffles to the engine case when the two don't match. Over all the sheet metal, hardware, and instructions are real good! But baffle attach points are different on my case. (My engine is a Lycoming parallel valve IO-360 with a narrow deck case.)
I thought I'd show some photos of my thoughts and seek some feedback.
The big Picture looks like this so far. I like the fit I have around #4 cylinder valve cover. As I add baffle counterclockwise around the engine, the next baffle behind the #4 cylinder head fits nice. After that, the baffle covers starts at the barrel of #4 and ends at the rear of the case at the middle of its seam/joint behind the Flow Divider. That is the first piece I want to give attention to.
The 1st photo below shows bolt a hole, and a cushion clamp/bolt assembly with red arrows. Vans designed this piece to be attached to the case via the bolt hole using a bushed AN4 bolt that gets attached to the case. The bolt is to go through the hole, then a bushing about 1" long, then into the case. My case does not have anything to receive that bolt. I don't believe it is industry best practice for a guy like me to fabricate one by drilling into the case, but behind the hole is about an inch space then a part of the case that is about 3/8 thick and flat, so a bolt hole could go there. But I'm not drilling one. I decided to secure this baffle piece via the cushion clamp/monodeck nut and AN3 bolt with a bushing between the cushion clamp and the baffling.
Therefore, I work alone, and need feedback about this attachment. Does my attachment seem prudent, or is there a concern with it? Is there a better method to secure it?
I am starting on the firewall forward section of an Experimental Bearhawk Patrol. This is my first build, and am unsure what an industry standard is for securing baffles to the engine case when the two don't match. Over all the sheet metal, hardware, and instructions are real good! But baffle attach points are different on my case. (My engine is a Lycoming parallel valve IO-360 with a narrow deck case.)
I thought I'd show some photos of my thoughts and seek some feedback.
The big Picture looks like this so far. I like the fit I have around #4 cylinder valve cover. As I add baffle counterclockwise around the engine, the next baffle behind the #4 cylinder head fits nice. After that, the baffle covers starts at the barrel of #4 and ends at the rear of the case at the middle of its seam/joint behind the Flow Divider. That is the first piece I want to give attention to.
The 1st photo below shows bolt a hole, and a cushion clamp/bolt assembly with red arrows. Vans designed this piece to be attached to the case via the bolt hole using a bushed AN4 bolt that gets attached to the case. The bolt is to go through the hole, then a bushing about 1" long, then into the case. My case does not have anything to receive that bolt. I don't believe it is industry best practice for a guy like me to fabricate one by drilling into the case, but behind the hole is about an inch space then a part of the case that is about 3/8 thick and flat, so a bolt hole could go there. But I'm not drilling one. I decided to secure this baffle piece via the cushion clamp/monodeck nut and AN3 bolt with a bushing between the cushion clamp and the baffling.
Therefore, I work alone, and need feedback about this attachment. Does my attachment seem prudent, or is there a concern with it? Is there a better method to secure it?