mvivion
SPONSOR
Installed one recently. A really, really light and very functional tool. If I were building a “light” airplane, or looking for a “get out of a nasty weather” solution, this would be high on the list:
View attachment 52822
MTV
Mike, in your opinion why choose the AV30 over G5?
I installed a (non-certified) G5 a couple years ago.
About $1500 for the unit, install kit, and backup battery.
In hindsight, I kinda wish I'd just gone with a Dynon D1.
Cheaper, "portable" so no paperwork, etc.
Their newest version, the D3, even has synthetic vision,
and only costs about 900 bucks.
That's what I just suggested to a friend of mine,
perfect as a backup for VFR flight.
Yes, they have a whole host of functions available. I didn't read the fine print till install, so a couple of the functions I wasn't aware of, but which would be useful (density altitude, for one) require a different type of temperature sensor than I have installed. I'll purchase the temp sensor they recommend, and get it installed at some point.That's the one with AOA, G meter, etc, isn't it? How are those functions?
I installed a (non-certified) G5 a couple years ago.
About $1500 for the unit, install kit, and backup battery.
In hindsight, I kinda wish I'd just gone with a Dynon D1.
Cheaper, "portable" so no paperwork, etc.
Their newest version, the D3, even has synthetic vision,
and only costs about 900 bucks.
That's what I just suggested to a friend of mine,
perfect as a backup for VFR flight.
Agree. I have a D3, and in my opinion the synthetic vision is useless. Also, the pitch attitude seems to drift. I liked my D1 better.very much less than impressed with the D3 synthetic vision
Agree. I have a D3, and in my opinion the synthetic vision is useless. Also, the pitch attitude seems to drift. I liked my D1 better.
I've had one in my panel since April. It's pretty dang cool. I'm not totally sold on the AOA function yet, but I like it overall. It replaced an electric turn coordinator and provides a lot more information in that tiny hole. I hope I never need it.
How is “Probeless” Angle of Attack Determined?
Angle of attack is determined by comparing aircraft pitch to the actual flight path angle through the air. This is equivalent to the angle at which the wing is intercepting the body of air surrounding the aircraft – exactly the same as a probe based AoA system. Pitch is determined by a precision internal AHRS, and flight path angle is determined by a precision ADC (airspeed and vertical speed). The resulting angle is then augmented with G-Load, as determined by internal acceleration sensors.
For example, during a climb, if the pitch angle is 10 degrees up, and the aircraft’s flight path through the air (forward airspeed and vertical speed) is also 10 degrees up, the equivalent AoA is 0 Degrees. However, if the flight path angle through the air is only 7 degrees, then the equivalent AoA is positive 3 degrees as the wing is no longer able to maintain full lift.
Therefore, no dedicated AoA probe is required – only internal inertial and pressure sensors (8 in total). Connection to the aircraft’s pitot static system is required.
Reference Sperry Patent #3,948,096 for additional implementation details.
Been looking at these. Is the AV30 certified version a stand alone instrument that can replace required instruments? If so, I'm sold. Need to do more homework. Lot of info in a small circle.
Anyone have any direct experience and wish to comment on uAvionx reliability/quality issues?
I have heard that some people were having trouble with the ADS-B beacons, so this is something I'd want to look into.
I normally would lean towards Garmin, but this thing appears much more capable. Right now, I'm about 50/50 between the two, mainly because the Garmin stuff is normally solid as a rock (or so it is in my limited experience).
I know, I know - it's very difficult to find any OPINIONS around here, but a guy can dream, right?