BC12D-4-85 liked this post
The chemistry tutorial above is courtesy of CamGuard. Note the short time (as little as 15-20 hrs) they suggest additives become depleted and the nastiness begins. If so, why fly 50 hrs on an oil....unless you use their product?
Gary
Through the years one of the aviation writer voices I've trusted is Ben Visser. He continues to advocate the use of leaded fuel in aircraft engines but continues to use 25% leaded to unleaded as a blend recommendation for breaking an engine in and occasional addition of leaded fuel throughout the engine's life. His reasoning centers around valve recession and valve heat transfer. In my own airplane ownership history valve recession and erosion has occurred in my engines. Valve sticking has not.
I see evidence of accumulated exhaust crud on my shocks and remove it regularly. I assume lead is a big component of this crud. I plan to blend in some unleaded fuel to see if I recognize a reduction in the exhaust deposits. I don't have the knowledge or tools to do any important testing to find my perfect fuel so I'll err to the lead-rich side with my 10:1 cylinders. I'm not focused on valve sticking. I want the best fuel for the entire engine.
mam90 liked this post
If valve sticking is the problem a little MMO in the oil may be useful. I've been told that's where it got it's start with airplanes. Subsequently an engine build shop owner told me a little MMO in the oil is the first thing a pilot should do for suspected morning sickness. It may not be a long term solution but it should buy time.
I routinely added MMO into my bulk fuel tank until talking to Mr Camguard about airplane engines and additives. He told me (this was over 10 years ago) that the MMO formula changed somewhere around 2000 and now contains a chlorinated something something and that was bad news for rubber and synthetic rubber. He didn't give its use much merit and said now it could actually do more harm than good. Since my 180 has bladder tanks I took his comments to heart and stopped using MMO. I can't recognize any difference in my engines.
MMO is primarily a mixture of mineral spirits (Stoddard solvent) and light oil with some other magic smells and colors added. In the lead scavenging discussion which of those components is providing the benefit? Mr Camguard suggested that if I believed MMO was helpful I could mix my own and leave out the bad stuff. FWIW Seafoam fuel treatment is a similar mineral spirits/oil product with isopropyl added. Anyone using that?
mam90 thanked for this post
I do run camguard. I used to read the threads about sticking valves and additives and be thankful I didn’t have to deal with that. Then, overhaul with all new parts including cylinders and here I am. Hard to accept that I ran for so long with zero issues, have changed nothing in how I operate and now seeing these problems. I’ll have to look into the MMO issue, thanks.
Great discussion! I thought, (maybe incorrectly) that engine start wasn’t recommended under 40*f if you were running straight 100w. Wrong? I run the Phillips 20/50 w/Camgaurd and I use MMO in the gas and fly about 200hrs/yr. I did develop low comp on one cyl last year (50/80) from a leaking exhaust valve. The valve guide was replaced now all 4 are running 78/80 but don’t believe that had anything to do with the oil. What about engine start at temps below 40*f?
RVBottomly liked this post
mam90 thanked for this post
Yes, that’s one of our thoughts. We built new cowling and all new baffling when we hung the engine. No engine monitor but we are going to try and rig something up to check temps. Thanks for the input..
Ok in the interest of completely muddying the water on what I wrote a few days back (see above). I was talking to Loni Habersetzer today about engine oil, he flies for Paul Claus and his engines go to TBO and beyond. I was telling him my experience with Phillips and what Paul had told me about just using straight weight Aeroshell. He fired back that Ultima Thule Airplanes all run Phillips 20-50XC now and have for at least 6-7 years since Paul asked him (Loni) what engine oil he uses because he had no problems ever making TBO. I asked Loni if he has ever had a stuck valve he said no. I will continue with my use of straight weights but here is evidence that maybe just believing in something can make it better![]()
Frequent flyers can use any oil. It's the unfrequent flyers that need some help.
Gary
G44 thanked for this post
Ok, is not flying the airplane 6 months a year as Ultima Thule does (when there season is over) consider as frequent or infrequently. They fly 6 months daily and then not at all for 6 months, airplanes are hangard.
Are the hangars heated in the off season? Edit: If they are heated above freezing find out what steps they take to reduce or prevent corrosion when sitting idle. Might be worth knowing.
Gary
Last edited by BC12D-4-85; 11-08-2020 at 08:40 PM.
Pop Alexandra thanked for this post
If you read all the posts it is a total crapshoot on what seems to work and what does not. Flying daily/weekly does seem to help for lifter/cam issues. Valve sticking is all over the board. I think one of the issues is what lean, hot, often to one person is not the same to another. Bottom line is when you notice a change even for a few seconds look into it. I do like all the information that people post because it actually has some science behind it!!
DENNY
mam90 liked this post
From what I've seen here and in other Forums, periodic borescoping and valve cover removal (with pics recorded over time) might help show a trend in valve condition and the buildup of visible deposits. I'm not an expert in either. I do know it's a good idea to have uniform valve to seat contact to dissipate valve heat, and valve to guide inspection (visual/wobble test) can detect deposits. Some of the valve stem blow-by deposits can coat the exposed valve and springs plus the inside of the adjacent valve cover. If it becomes apparent then maybe there's a problem to be addressed. We try to keep the costs down and add a prevention step but maybe this would be worth doing?
Gary
Edit: I found this lengthy video on using a borescope in an aircraft application: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dk5o4__0y-4 Guess i'll learn something tomorrow.
Last edited by BC12D-4-85; 11-08-2020 at 10:59 PM.
JWE liked this post
Indeed. It should be common practice and would significantly extend the life-span.
________________________________________________
Alexandra from https://cianalytics.com/technology/dry-colorimetry
nightflyer liked this post
Why not follow Lycoming's guidance? They allow around 400 CHT and they have a 400hr valve inspection written in the maintenance manual, operators manual, and encase you missed it they also published it in a Si, and a mandatory SB, if I am not mistaken. Yet, how many of us educated owners bother with it? Worse yet, how many FAA shops know about it or provide the required "push" to educate the owners about it? I know, if I fly part 91 I don't have to, but in some things it is in our best interests. I think that may be the case here.
larry
Last edited by larrym; 04-05-2021 at 07:34 PM. Reason: spelling
BC12D-4-85 liked this post
Last edited by nightflyer; 04-06-2021 at 06:10 AM.
I’ve got the cat. Can’t find a new engine anywhere.![]()
nightflyer liked this post
RaisedByWolves liked this post
Like I told Jason, FedEx lost his engine, the pictures are of my new engine. Just for the record it is all legal with all the LyCon tricks and processes. I just have to finish these FX3s so they can get to Sun & Fun and I can go hang an engine.
Steve Pierce
Everybody is ignorant, only on different subjects.
Will RogersRaisedByWolves liked this post
When your GA Sensenich prop goes missing, I bet I know where to look. FedEx will probably be to blame for it also![]()
RaisedByWolves liked this post
Steve Pierce liked this post
We are planning a prop test session.
Bookmarks