• If You Are Having Trouble Logging In with Your Old Username and Password, Please use this Forgot Your Password link to get re-established.
  • Hey! Be sure to login or register!

supercub cad-3d

osvaldosurf

Registered User
Hello, my name is Osvaldo, I'm a designer and my hobby is to design planes. I'm on a new project that is pa-18, the plans I got on the site supercubproject
When analyzing the drawings, he decides to start with the wing because he thinks it is the most difficult part, and because I suspect there are parts of the drawing that is missing, as I am not a specialist in pipercubs, I am a bit wrapped up in the wing variations that this plane has in Great variety of ribs, I will put photos so you can help me and guide me. At the end of the project I will make the complete drawing available for download for everyone.1.png2.png3.png4.png5.png6.png
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    553.1 KB · Views: 412
  • 2.png
    2.png
    369.9 KB · Views: 311
  • 3.png
    3.png
    465.9 KB · Views: 309
  • 4.png
    4.png
    439.7 KB · Views: 266
  • 5.png
    5.png
    236.5 KB · Views: 282
  • 6.png
    6.png
    675.4 KB · Views: 298
BTW... the actual APPROVED ribs made by the different manufactures are all DIFFERENT shapes & sizes than the drawings, and each others parts...
 
7.png8.png9.png10.png11.png12.png
 

Attachments

  • 7.png
    7.png
    507.2 KB · Views: 253
  • 8.png
    8.png
    341.1 KB · Views: 289
  • 9.png
    9.png
    760.6 KB · Views: 266
  • 10.png
    10.png
    706 KB · Views: 243
  • 11.png
    11.png
    847.9 KB · Views: 338
  • 12.png
    12.png
    590.3 KB · Views: 253
13.png14.png15.png16.png17.png
 

Attachments

  • 13.png
    13.png
    570 KB · Views: 251
  • 14.png
    14.png
    706.5 KB · Views: 272
  • 15.png
    15.png
    734.7 KB · Views: 253
  • 16.png
    16.png
    731.8 KB · Views: 239
  • 17.png
    17.png
    251.1 KB · Views: 269
I'm redoing the wing from the beginning. During the works I noticed that the wing has a twist in its length, very little to be seen by inattentive eyes, this twist is applied in the spars, the rear19.png20.png21.png22.png23.png24.png spar has a positive dihedral that the front spar, can anyone confirm me?
 

Attachments

  • 19.png
    19.png
    498.7 KB · Views: 243
  • 20.png
    20.png
    594.8 KB · Views: 411
  • 21.png
    21.png
    395.5 KB · Views: 231
  • 22.png
    22.png
    612.8 KB · Views: 235
  • 23.png
    23.png
    690.4 KB · Views: 264
  • 24.png
    24.png
    668.6 KB · Views: 249
40.png43.pngengine mount piper original e dynafocal engine mount
 

Attachments

  • 40.png
    40.png
    503.2 KB · Views: 250
  • 43.png
    43.png
    551.6 KB · Views: 305
Really this is the most difficult project I have ever done.44.png45.png46.png47.png
 

Attachments

  • 44.png
    44.png
    1 MB · Views: 219
  • 45.png
    45.png
    741.5 KB · Views: 221
  • 46.png
    46.png
    293.9 KB · Views: 327
  • 47.png
    47.png
    919.8 KB · Views: 222
You are doing a great job. I bought my first computer about 25 years ago with the idea of making airplane parts drawings with it. I've tried several CAD type programs and have never been satisfied with the results. You have my admiration. Keep it up. :up
 
Don't know how exact you are trying to make this but one small trap is that the drag strut holes along the front and rear spar change very slightly along the spar length. Concerning the rear spar: The first inboard one is at 2 1/2 inches from the spar bottom. The second has no dimension but at at 80 13/16 out the hole center is at 2 15/16 from the spar bottom. The final hole on the diagram at the tip says 2 9/32. The drag struts are installed level so the gradually lowering holes along the rear spar have the effect of raising the outboard end of the rear spar a little over 3/16 or actual 7/32. Just the opposite happens with the front spar as the inboard hole is 1 29/32 and the most outboard hole is 2 5/16! If you were to make all the drag struts level with each other and viewed the spars from the wing front (winding stick style) the spars would form and "X" with 3/8"height difference at each end or a total of 3/4" difference if you raised the outboard end of the rear spar to make the front spar level. OR at least that's my take on it. I'm not sure anyone else has described it that way so maybe you will get some other comments. Apparently the original designers wanted the drag struts "in Plane" and the rest of the wing spars and ribs and all other parts could rotate around the drag struts as needed so the whole thing is kind of "wonky".

One thing as you look at the wing drawings remember the drawings are for two different airplanes so the inboard spar edges they show are extended "in" a few inches for the J3 cub wing. You have to refer to the notes (see figure 5 on the front spar drawing) and then adjust your dimensions for the Supercub wing. Welcome to the world of 40's Pipers!
 
I understand very little of English, so it's a bit complicated to understand and communicate, but I understood a little what you wanted to say, at least I think!
The pa-18 piper is my sixth aircraft that I build in solidworks and the pa-18 is the second aircraft I see with this kind of twist on the wing, the first was the cri cry drawn by frances michel colombam, the wing was born with a Angle of incidence and the wing tip has a negative incidence angle to compensate for twisting during flight. And this is in the drawings in a very subtle way, I started to do the wing and when it is close to finish I started to notice that there was something strange that is not in my plans, then I came back and did all the work again being with now with the twist and It worked!
This aircraft is without a doubt the most difficult aircraft I ever made !!!
 
I think all type accepted aircraft have the "twist" and some dihedral. The twist is to cause the wing tips to stall last (lower angle of attack than the rest of the wing) thereby giving some aileron control even after the rest of the wing has stalled. The dihedral (spelling?) makes the aircraft more stable in the roll axis.

Sorry about the language barrier but I am not good at communicating even with someone who speaks English.

I wish someone else with more knowledge would post about the relationship between the drag struts and the spars. I think I have it right in the above post but I am not sure? Because I believe Piper meant for the drags struts to all be level with each other for maximum strength when the drag wires are tightened I believe the wings should have a 3/4 inch block under the rear spar as they are assembled but some believe the rear should be elevated at the tip 1 1/2 inch. One thing for sure if when the wing is mounted if anything you want to much twist so you can "pull" it down with the rear strut (strut in tension). You don't want to be pushing (compression) with the rear strut to put more twist in!
 
I think all type accepted aircraft have the "twist" and some dihedral. The twist is to cause the wing tips to stall last (lower angle of attack than the rest of the wing) thereby giving some aileron control even after the rest of the wing has stalled. The dihedral (spelling?) makes the aircraft more stable in the roll axis.

This is actually called wash-out. Dihedral is an entirely different thing, altogether.

But other than that, I think everything else in the part I quoted is correct. The rest of your post: sorry, but I have no idea!
 
49.png50.png51.png52.png53.png
 

Attachments

  • 49.png
    49.png
    294.6 KB · Views: 198
  • 50.png
    50.png
    477.4 KB · Views: 175
  • 51.png
    51.png
    673.6 KB · Views: 199
  • 52.png
    52.png
    838 KB · Views: 187
  • 53.png
    53.png
    253.8 KB · Views: 192
This is actually called wash-out. Dihedral is an entirely different thing, altogether.

But other than that, I think everything else in the part I quoted is correct. The rest of your post: sorry, but I have no idea!

qsmx440,

I re-read what you had written - I'm sorry! You correctly described dihedral, I just missed it.

Sometimes, with some designs, actual dihedral is not required. There are some designs that have a "dihedral effect" without requiring the wings to be angled upward.
 
57.png58.png59.png60.png61.png62.png63.png
 

Attachments

  • 57.png
    57.png
    386.7 KB · Views: 177
  • 58.png
    58.png
    479.4 KB · Views: 164
  • 59.png
    59.png
    528.9 KB · Views: 158
  • 60.png
    60.png
    733 KB · Views: 176
  • 61.png
    61.png
    335.6 KB · Views: 190
  • 62.png
    62.png
    345 KB · Views: 176
  • 63.png
    63.png
    365.7 KB · Views: 184
Amazing work! I have been playing with solid works for a little while. I still like AutoCAD 2000-it is what I'm use to. You are doing amazing work. I'd like to have a copy of your CRI CRI that is a neat little plane.


Sent from my iPhone using SuperCub.Org
 
appeared a person interested in financing the rest of the project. unfortunately I had to withdraw it, but in the future when I finish the whole plane I will sell it for 50 dollars. unfortunately the money speaks louder.
 
Back
Top