Interesting topic. One I have thought on for years.
I'm not sure what this rule will do to the industry. Maybe help, maybe not.
I don't have a big problem with the low time F/O per se. It's the low time COMBINED time in which I have a problem. F/O - 200hrs., first month in airline. Capt. 1,500hrs, 1.5 years with airline still wet ATP in his pocket.
F/O - "wow, I've never seen a tough line of weather before, what do we do?"
Capt - "I don't know, I've never seen one either!"
We all have to get experience somehow. Every one of us pilots started with no hours in our logbooks.
There is even a time in the Sixties when Northwest and United were hiring pilots with 200 hours, a pulse, and an instrument ticket. The DIFFERENCE is they were sitting in the flight engineer seat for a couple years and then FO seat for years next to a Captain that had 10-20 or more years of experience. Low time FO's got to gain experience next to one that was experienced and modeled how to make good judgements.
Now, all regional airlines are not like that. To my old Mesaba brothers, I know there are a LOT of 20 year captains there.
Even though I would be unaffected career wise at this stage, my dream of a better safety world would be for anything that says UNITED on it be flown by one seniority list, anything that says Delta one seniority list. (I'm neither pro or anti airline union)
That would ensure any low time new hire is going to sit next to a guy who's been there a while.
I don't often do it because of where I live, and say what you will, but I like Southwest because I KNOW they have no little, uncomfortable planes piloted by lowtime kids.
A lot said, I know, but I didn't start the topic....