Marc Olson
GONE WEST
Seattle, WA
I had the opportunity last week to get some (side)stick time in a Cirrus SR-20. A friend of mine flew up to Seattle from Chico, CA to Shelton, WA where we were both attending a conference. We took advantage of a break to fly to Everett in his plane, get out my PA-12 and do a couple of grass strip landings, then back to Shelton.
What a study in contrasts!
Everything about the Cirrus screams 'modern, clean sheet design.' From the glass cockpit (including all charts) to the engine/prop management, I'm sure there are few single engine GA planes that bear so little resemblance in terms of flow and workload mangement.
I flew down in the right seat and had little difficulty adjusting to the sidestick. The plane flies heavy, but is almost twitchy in terms of trim adjustments. My first landing was interesting--he flies a 90 knot final approach, almost my top speed in 64M. The low wing perspective made me feel like I was going to drive the prop into the pavement before the flare.
It could have been just my friend, but I don't think he stopped fiddling with the computers or gps/comms all the way down and back (I flew left seat home). For a VFR flight in the local area all I needed was to look out the window but he was pulling up approach plates and airport diagrams, etc. For a new pilot planning to go direct to regional jets it's probably the right type of aircraft to train in.
Needless to say our flight in the cub was as memorable for him as my time in the SR-20. He was blown away by the feel of the plane, actually landing on grass, etc. I encouraged him to find a nearby place to get his TW and rent a J-3 just for grins.
As and IFR platform and a solid XC cruiser I was impressed with the Cirrus. Useful load is probably the limiting factor.
What a study in contrasts!
Everything about the Cirrus screams 'modern, clean sheet design.' From the glass cockpit (including all charts) to the engine/prop management, I'm sure there are few single engine GA planes that bear so little resemblance in terms of flow and workload mangement.
I flew down in the right seat and had little difficulty adjusting to the sidestick. The plane flies heavy, but is almost twitchy in terms of trim adjustments. My first landing was interesting--he flies a 90 knot final approach, almost my top speed in 64M. The low wing perspective made me feel like I was going to drive the prop into the pavement before the flare.
It could have been just my friend, but I don't think he stopped fiddling with the computers or gps/comms all the way down and back (I flew left seat home). For a VFR flight in the local area all I needed was to look out the window but he was pulling up approach plates and airport diagrams, etc. For a new pilot planning to go direct to regional jets it's probably the right type of aircraft to train in.
Needless to say our flight in the cub was as memorable for him as my time in the SR-20. He was blown away by the feel of the plane, actually landing on grass, etc. I encouraged him to find a nearby place to get his TW and rent a J-3 just for grins.
As and IFR platform and a solid XC cruiser I was impressed with the Cirrus. Useful load is probably the limiting factor.