RVBottomly
PATRON
Asotin County Washington (KLWS)
I know you had to do it, but that photo puts my heart in my throat.
Just a small bump in the road. I'm enjoying being able to turn wrenches in my own place and my wife has been a willing helper. Airplane fun is what you make it.
I need a couple if rolling tool benches!
I need a couple if rolling tool benches!
Have you done any airspeed calibration? I found that the IAS on mine is 100% accurate from 155 mph down to 40 mph. Below 40 it abruptly becomes a +5 mph or more error. This due to the angle of the pitot tube to the relative wind. When you get the opportunity try to notice what the GPS ground speed is upon touch down with a zero wind condition. The best that I've been able to do is 28 mph while on floats. I don't recall the IAS at that time, obviously off scale unreliable.
Also at 2050# with ballast, what is your CG?
My pitot tube is a L shaped Kollsman mounted under the center of the wing between the jury struts and wing attach locations on a six inch mast away from any airflow disturbance from struts and prop wash. It is pitched slightly nose down. I think that if it were pitched a bit more nose down that it would be more accurate at low speeds. Both the pitot and static ports are connected to a new airspeed indicator. Accuracy is supposed to be within +/- 10* alignment of the tube to the airflow. I used a GPS flying in a 360* circle to determine the wind direction. Then did opposite direction runs in the zero wind direction comparing indicated with gps. This was done in 10 mph increments through the entire speed range. Frankly I was surprised that it was so accurate having done many of these calibration tests over the years. This is the only one which has been 100% accurate throughout the entire range. Just got lucky I guess.Just curious how did you find that it was accruate to 155 mph?
My airspeed is off by 10 mph, any ideas on the easiest wat to fix that. I was thinking of making a slip on bullet shaped end piece that I could drill out until I achieve the correct orifice size. Any other ideas.
If I recall my original J-4 has both pitot & static on the jury strut. I have not looked at the struts in a decade or so. Of all things my jury strut material arrived a few hours ago so it a good time for planning.charlie, put your pitot tube 1/2 way down the jury strut and point it down 10-15 degrees or what ever you can when flying level. just like they did with the 1940s J3s.
That makes sense and agrees with my +/-10 deg. This is the pitot which is on my Cub. The pitot and static ports are both the same distance from the wing.Pete - At high AOA there is a pressure gradient below the wing, with pressure decreasing downward from the wing's lower surface. I demonstrated this by tufting my jury struts. The tufts tend downward, to below the flight path angle.
Given that the static source is closer to the wing than pitot source, as with the stock Piper arrangement, then the static component of total pressure is unequal between the two, and the reduced difference in total pressure between pitot and static source displays as artificially low airspeed. This is at least part of the too-low airspeed reading at high AOA, at least on my plane with the stock pitot-static configuration.
The reading I've done suggests that pitot angle is not a significant influence on dynamic pressure for "small" angles. If I recall correctly, "small" in this context might be something on the order of 20 deg or so.
There’s nothing to figure out. I had a 400. I spent a good part if a day with Scott at SAP last week. Nice guy, tough job.
https://newsline.kitplanes.com/2019/02/28/superior-buying-back-all-xp-400-and-xp-382-engines/
Do you have the 382? Hope the get it figured out soon
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Superior is not going to want those cranks in circulation, They will probably destroy them Lycoming styleso, trying to look at the brighter side.... superior should offer these for sale as Air boat engines!!! 220 HP airboats!!! hate to see them go to the landfill....