The engines weigh more. Therefore the CG shifts forward. The CG shift forward reduces performance. For an accurate comparison you will need the CG to be in the same location. Your J-3 performs better with you in the back seat doesn't it?How do the upgrades to 105, 115 n 125HP effect performance n empty weight? Thx!!
The engines weigh more. Therefore the CG shifts forward. The CG shift forward reduces performance. For an accurate comparison you will need the CG to be in the same location. Your J-3 performs better with you in the back seat doesn't it?
Would you mind sharing some details and specs on your -95.
Why is there no blisters on your cowl? Thx!
Dont like the looks of the cowl bumps??
Is the altimeter in that cub (pictured) catty-wampus for a reason or am I just un-cub-sperienced ?
Nice!fresh from the scales...
My L-18C with 5qt of oil and non-useable fuel weights 955lbs. (433kg); CG @ 15.16in. (38.5cm) behind LE.
Conti C90-12F with Delco-Remy starter and generator, Marvel-Schebler carburetor, battery in baggage compartment, metal prop, original expander tube brakes, two fuel tanks (2x 18gal.)
nav-lights, ACL
radio, XPDR, AT-1 (traffic warning device) and minimum VFR-instruments
Ceconite
Quite a difference to what Piper claims for a basic PA-18-95 (PA-18 Owner's Handbook): 800lbs. I know a basic PA-18-95 has a wood prop, only one fuel tank and no electric system, but covered in cotton... Well, I am not sure if it explains 155lbs. difference.
On the other hand the Owner's Handbook says a PA-18-95 will cruise at 100MPH which I never come near... ;-)
Björn
On the other hand the Owner's Handbook says a PA-18-95 will cruise at 100MPH which I never come near... ;-)