Rob
MEMBER
AZ06
12Geezer,
My experience is limited to only one airplane with each... I can say that either is more user friendly than the "older" systems. The Stewarts system is probably a tad more user friendly and probably more so if you've never used any of the others. The glues are distinctly different than each other or the "older" stuff as well. I personally like using Airtech glue better, but as a whole so far I prefer the Stewarts system. I have no idea how either does in real long terms. My Airtech covered cub was trashed in a hail storm after just a couple years.
Lots of systems claim to be user friendly in terms of chemical or odor. I can honestly say that if your wife was blind (or exceptionally understanding) you could get away with covering a plane with Stewarts in your living room. Unless you put you head in the container the glue has no odor... Not a big deal for the big shops, but for a do - it - yourselfer it comes in handy...
Take care, Rob
My experience is limited to only one airplane with each... I can say that either is more user friendly than the "older" systems. The Stewarts system is probably a tad more user friendly and probably more so if you've never used any of the others. The glues are distinctly different than each other or the "older" stuff as well. I personally like using Airtech glue better, but as a whole so far I prefer the Stewarts system. I have no idea how either does in real long terms. My Airtech covered cub was trashed in a hail storm after just a couple years.
Lots of systems claim to be user friendly in terms of chemical or odor. I can honestly say that if your wife was blind (or exceptionally understanding) you could get away with covering a plane with Stewarts in your living room. Unless you put you head in the container the glue has no odor... Not a big deal for the big shops, but for a do - it - yourselfer it comes in handy...
Take care, Rob