oldbaldguy
Registered User
AOPA On-line reported the following today: A Miami-area glider company will keep flying, thanks to a reprieve from regulators who were demanding a $2 million insurance policy that would have grounded the operation for good. Miami Gliders owner Steve Diehl rallied local lawmakers and other supporters to argue his view that gliders, which use very little fuel, shouldn't require a $2 million policy for environmental hazards. Regulators finally agreed, lowering the insurance requirement to a more manageable $500,000.
I don't know which is more remarkable, the requirement for a $2,000,000 EPA insurance policy or the assertion that gliders don't use much fuel.
I don't know which is more remarkable, the requirement for a $2,000,000 EPA insurance policy or the assertion that gliders don't use much fuel.